NAGPUR: Saying “I love you” does not amount to sexual harassment unless accompanied by conduct suggesting sexual intent, Bombay high court’s Nagpur bench ruled Monday while overturning a 2017 conviction under the Pocso Act.
Justice Urmila JoshiPhalke acquitted a 25-yearold man from Katol in Nagpur district, nearly eight years after he was sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment for harassing a 17year-old girl. He appealed the session court verdict in HC and was out on bail.
“If somebody says that he is in love with another person or expresses his feelings that in itself would not amount to an intent showing some sort of sexual intention” the judge said in her order. “Words expressed as ‘I love you’ would not by themselves amount to ‘sexual intent’ as contemplated by the legislature,” she added.
The case dated back to Oct 2015, when a class 11 student accused the man of stopping her and her cousin , grabbing her hand and saying: “I love you”. Based on her complaint, police charged him under sections 354A (sexual harassment) and 354D (stalking) of IPC, along with Section 8 of Pocso Act.
Two years later, the sessions court convicted him. His counsel Sonali Khobragade said his actions did not meet the legal threshold for sexual assault or stalking as there was no repeated contact or physical act indicating sexual intent.
Justice Joshi-Phalke agreed. “There should be something more that must suggest the real intention is to introduce the angle of sex…,” she said. “The offence under Pocso Act is not made out as there is no allegation that the accused touched the girl with sexual intent.”
Justice Urmila JoshiPhalke acquitted a 25-yearold man from Katol in Nagpur district, nearly eight years after he was sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment for harassing a 17year-old girl. He appealed the session court verdict in HC and was out on bail.
“If somebody says that he is in love with another person or expresses his feelings that in itself would not amount to an intent showing some sort of sexual intention” the judge said in her order. “Words expressed as ‘I love you’ would not by themselves amount to ‘sexual intent’ as contemplated by the legislature,” she added.
The case dated back to Oct 2015, when a class 11 student accused the man of stopping her and her cousin , grabbing her hand and saying: “I love you”. Based on her complaint, police charged him under sections 354A (sexual harassment) and 354D (stalking) of IPC, along with Section 8 of Pocso Act.
Two years later, the sessions court convicted him. His counsel Sonali Khobragade said his actions did not meet the legal threshold for sexual assault or stalking as there was no repeated contact or physical act indicating sexual intent.
Justice Joshi-Phalke agreed. “There should be something more that must suggest the real intention is to introduce the angle of sex…,” she said. “The offence under Pocso Act is not made out as there is no allegation that the accused touched the girl with sexual intent.”
You may also like
DWP confirms Winter Fuel Payment dates details - including when and how much you will get
Diddy not guilty of sex-trafficking and racketeering as he reacts to shock verdict
Doja Cat reveals what she doesn't want to become
Tejashwi Yadav makes 15 promises to disabled community ahead of Bihar polls
If Bumrah Was Fit To Play Then Surely You Need To Pick The Best Bowler In The World, Says Finch
